Beyond The Headlines: Why The West Gets India Wrong?
A spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on 9th August that the global body stands against attacks on Hindu minorities in Bangladesh amid the ongoing violence.
“What we've made clear is we want to make sure that the
violence that has been occurring in Bangladesh in recent weeks is tamped down.
Certainly, we stand against any racially based attacks or racially based
incitement to violence,” said Farhan Haq, deputy spokesperson for the
Secretary-General.
In the past week, numerous videos and pictures have surfaced
on the internet documenting the burning of temples, businesses, and homes owned
by the Hindu community. This unrest follows Shaikh Hasina’s resignation and
flight from the country amid violent protests.
Despite this assertion, the media and Western nations have been
non-vocal. There is silence from the alleged "saviours of human rights and
democracy." Just consider what may have happened in the Western media and
in Western nations if the circumstances had been reversed and Muslims had been
attacked. We have previously witnessed their treatment of India, especially in
relation to Jammu and Kashmir.
A recent article published by the New York Times
demonstrates how these individuals are misrepresenting India's history. Western
nations, and the United States in particular, have frequently displayed their
partial behaviour.
We haven't heard the phrase "All Eyes on Bangladesh" since the sectarian violence that has broken out in Bangladesh just now.
Looking back, the US disregarded messages delivered by one of its own officers in Bangladesh during the Bangladesh Liberation Movement in 1971.
Then came the Blood Telegram, the strongest-worded protest
letter in US Foreign Service history. Signed by twenty US diplomats in Dhaka,
including attorney Archer Blood, it was a dissent note criticizing the Nixon
administration for remaining silent during the mass slaughter.
An approximate estimate of the number of Bengalis killed in
the genocide perpetrated by Pakistani forces in the early 1970s is close to 3
million. The systematic killing by the Pakistani army targeted Hindu men,
academics, and professionals; women were spared murder, but almost 400,000 were
raped and forced into sexual slavery.
President Richard Nixon and his National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger,
responded to the US Consul General's letters to the American brass with a stoic
silence. They ignored the cries for assistance from their own officials because
they were playing a dirty game to win over China. The past reveals the
prejudiced side of American policies.
Amidst the current crisis, the principal opposition party in
Bangladesh declared that Sheikh Hasina, the prime minister who was removed,
should be prosecuted domestically. The party also cautioned India that by
providing sanctuary to the former leader, it may potentially sour relations
with its neighbour.
Bangladesh's Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President
AM Mahbub Uddin Khokon called on India to arrest former prime minister Sheikh
Hasina and her sister Sheikh Rehana, and send them back to Bangladesh, Daily
Star reported. In a statement, he said, "We want to maintain a good
relationship with the people of India. Please, arrest Sheikh Hasina and Sheikh
Rehana, who fled the country, and send them back to Bangladesh.
We now need to wait and see what India does. Sheikh Hasina
is still present, and she will determine whether or not to proceed with a
wait-and-see approach. But I have a question in mind. With so many Muslim
countries, why did she travel to India?. Could it be the fact that it is nearest
or she has good relations.
I think there is an easy solution. India, one of the world's oldest nations
with a strong moral foundation, has traditionally held the view that
"Anyone who asks for help or surrenders should be given shelter."
Simply flip through the pages of history to uncover countless times be it the
case of Sindhis from Pakistan, Zoroastrians and Bora Muslims or even those that were sheltered during the partition. It is certain that India is firm on its own policy and goes on its own way.
Jai Hind!
Harsh Pargat
Please share and follow me.
Your comments are welcome.
Very good
ReplyDelete